From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 29 17:03:51 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB0F106566B;
	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mdf356@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.216.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959628FC13;
	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:03:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so4268800qwc.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
	:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=p8xrOARWg6/llW2wECMeZsnhh1PdlMJNf0CD/Se1fwI=;
	b=vtYYI5pvQsMbnYwRAVznmZ/U8lW0uSuCcGPZRJTrdgS+F0V3y9HrE7SZzBNSp+DJRI
	jkf593QQeft7sB2jCgW0YX1j9auolatfs9KeZIL7hqhvOY6Ar8TcUPBwUJ54A1cn5svJ
	ehkql5fwnOLxDW1zaW7JWzqRPC1sJ2YfwYW8U=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.87.137 with SMTP id w9mr5757304qcl.284.1314635609977; Mon,
	29 Aug 2011 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mdf356@gmail.com
Received: by 10.229.98.8 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <j3g8o3$2fq$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <j38lj5$s9a$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<CAGH67wRxehY4fZPOd1hqXkBffOrSvh4ujYw6XeqVj_VsWdDsaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<j3g8o3$2fq$1@dough.gmane.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:33:29 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ydgK4SNDOcKQUHw0NjIX3dJ_N6s
Message-ID: <CAMBSHm_Sv_KZUs4h-tDGAZCq8s2qo_bMmfZxLbVkcH1=_Wu0OQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: mdf@FreeBSD.org
To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Large machine test ideas
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 17:03:51 -0000

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 26/08/2011 19:44, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> I think that I'll need a 9-CURRENT snapshot on it to run all 128 CPUs,
>>> right?
>>
>> A 9.0-BETA1 snapshot, yes.
>
> Well, I'll leave it another half an hour but the 9.9-beta1 shapshot
> froze on boot after showing a "SRAT: No CPU found for memory domain 4".

This message implies the memory affinity information coming from ACPI
is either non-sensical, or you have an unexpected physical setup where
there really are CPUs with no memory in the local sockets.

You should be able to boot with something like hint.srat.0="disabled"
at the boot loader prompt.

Thanks,
matthew