From owner-freebsd-net  Fri Aug 31 10:19:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCBB37B401
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7VHJJn79650;
	Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:19:19 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:19:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200108311719.f7VHJJn79650@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Steve Shorter <steve@nomad.tor.lets.net>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Tuning UDP for NFS
In-Reply-To: <20010831130902.A15501@nomad.lets.net>
References: <20010831130902.A15501@nomad.lets.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-net.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-net>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

<<On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:09:02 -0400, Steve Shorter <steve@nomad.tor.lets.net> said:

> 	net.inet.udp.maxdgram
> 	net.inet.udp.recvspace

> 	I assume that increasing both of these will improve performance.

Neither of these have any impact on UDP performance.  In fact, there
really are no UDP performance parameters to be tweaked; the UDP
protocol doesn't have much in the way of mechanism which would need
it.  You need to instead look at tuning NFS.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message