From nobody Thu Aug 25 13:24:12 2022 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-all@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MD3b33vy6z4ZYbd; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MD3b33KB9z4BK4; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1661433855; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9j3aLZRbTgDrI6a1pIKWMHoi0NfBNnwEQ3h5LsA6N2g=; b=GT+/ovDZ+LQUXLORZFDnPNiaeJd6xDQh97uamKUTH4+3Nj6/IAgzlmMTg6Dpgz3gr/6jiR lsnV3CudrqFoWcRvclSuSe3C8SoBv7XqAmnjxOtAXtviK5TXn+czjKkFXd0l7dtO3k2mFF RwJuDae9HtYh7J9GY5lblBt0TaaxRFSSJfS1XeDbeXKKf6TvfqSZmPFRemWh2TqGlR1WVw 69z4ZUvIZtogT/AwuJQ6RPRzYBXF8UJ/ylMWY95/pMI3mW8+GnAerZ1dhGp2TqvKFV74HO +un8kxtnc6kQ3FXW1SWCKTwgX1J7V1NvmHQ54DgzfTxIBLni0Bno0Tcyjph5rA== Received: from aniel.nours.eu (nours.eu [IPv6:2001:41d0:8:3a4d::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MD3b31qJbzj0R; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BCA6912C581; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:24:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 15:24:12 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Piotr Kubaj Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-ports-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: 8ecb1f814114 - main - Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0" Message-ID: <20220825132412.vr2vvkxejnqefzq2@aniel.nours.eu> References: <202208251050.27PAoUmi075877@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20220825120826.couaapv3odwpjilf@aniel.nours.eu> List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-all List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1661433855; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9j3aLZRbTgDrI6a1pIKWMHoi0NfBNnwEQ3h5LsA6N2g=; b=u3Ckli8HvecnA/DTr7GT9ezHOyMFUxh9s25X14VGofy/fgkwgcytY8lT1Voyyq8u6Dy6zY 5Idl8W8R06e/D/ErfD+2w/qm+g2+zEJhe6f+jOLBRpE3OfHYhozVcmwlUGoz9piHbIqaJ1 UoA2awl0Qo+SHOixplLsY1L4zUaLm9a5uTb8o4nGPOgcg0WFt8ROwcn3t04BSvUMZSSAKO cygntw+Nc+pFVtzx6ocUC+nzOhnFKzczSWqFTnDMU17S1C/+PfMmtwAu2u8MZnXYSFKA1k g85Mq+QeZg/h8gPa6cw1JNEr7grToVDnE7JhI+KAge8wyxbz+JZujRHb3MIfuw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1661433855; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Ih0efCDwUh4vScM98RdBMw6R7F0HQLx2JRCaZxjXEyrcTFzZRaUXTMYu7h5lQUNzgtbaEK rHWA1TDZ6CMQ1mgwda0I500B++eamqgM5+d2QOYUtinURgkQjScGQuGM07iY8ytb0b5Mod S5+KkPXM9S9u0IYCzineJJTV3RzAF6yYYfHZXyS97PT5CIrRZTc7px6WJTLv0Gw8TQxPbQ K7F4a6FlYQahGnKzCyWi6hF23nH0jPR3CE+E/7GR2a4qECtF1PDxA9fSRK7MnR+0MSGRzU r5b9b+WTzoG78fdYBhh8CYjQlqyt+6n6LIMkOKy8gCKSp0DnuMLtvp6aGPPMJA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 02:21:28PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 22-08-25 14:08:26, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:50:30AM +0000, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > > The branch main has been updated by pkubaj: > > > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=8ecb1f8141144c1603eb4026122d2e60eeaccd64 > > > > > > commit 8ecb1f8141144c1603eb4026122d2e60eeaccd64 > > > Author: Piotr Kubaj > > > AuthorDate: 2022-08-25 10:29:24 +0000 > > > Commit: Piotr Kubaj > > > CommitDate: 2022-08-25 10:49:36 +0000 > > > > > > Revert "lang/rust: Update to 1.63.0" > > > > > > This reverts commit f36cc819accadae1fefc14c203e5fbe9c74e1492. > > > > > > I asked for an exp-run for powerpc and powerpc64 on a recently provided > > > cluster machine but got no reply. > > > > > > PR: 265915 > > > > You cannot take the decision to revert on your own for many reasons: > > > > 1. etiquete: we ask people to actually revert if needed and escalate if they > > don't, we never revert directly ourself! the only one allowed to do "rude" revert > > are people taking care of the package building when something break the delivery > > of packages for Tier 1 > I did it myself so that users don't upgrade in the meantime, since that > would create further confusion. If I let it wait, then PORTEPOCH should > have been bumped for all the affected ports, which I think we all agree > would be troublesome. No what will happen is given it works on Tier1, the Tier2 will fix one by one the issues that raised if any without reverting, meaning no PORTEPOCH would be needed. > > > > > 2. an exp-run happened and was granted by portmgr, exp-run are costly we cannot > > expect exp-runs for non tier 1 architecture for every changes (beside the fact > > :x > > I do not ask for exp-runs "for every change". In fact, this was the 1st > time I asked for an exp-run on powerpc*. > > If you can't expect exp-runs on non-Tier 1, why do we have powerpc* > exp-run machines? We do not have those machine functionnal! so we cannot do those exp-run, and even if we had, it will be at the discression of the people doing the exp-run to see if they have the resources or not to add an extra target for exp-run. > > This also wouldn't have happened if antoine@ had explained earlier he's > not able to do exp-runs on powerpc*. While I agree that antoine should have answered (maybe he missed the messages) it does not mean that you are allowed to make a driven by revert. > > > > > 3. powerpc* is not yet a Tier 1 so there is no promise on the delivery of > > packages. > > Yes, but everyone can still build from ports. yes but again this is tier 2! same lack of warranty > > > > > > So please revert your revert! > Now I just want to check powerpc64 and powerpc. As soon as I do that, I > will. No this is not how this is supposed to work. I would be sad to have to revert the revert myself :(. Best regards, Bapt