Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:55:43 -0500 From: Damien Tougas <damien@tougas.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: A question about kernel modules Message-ID: <200303071155.43785.damien@tougas.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there any advantage/disadvantage to using kernel moduls vs. staticly linking stuff in the kernel? I would like to eliminate everything from my kernel config that can be loaded as a module, then load them at boot using loader.conf. Is there any reason I would not want to do that? It seems to me that it would make things much easier. Why does FreeBSD not do this by default for the GENERIC kernel? Thanks. -- Damien Tougas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303071155.43785.damien>