From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun  4 01:29:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6DDA937B401; Wed,  4 Jun 2003 01:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk (chiark.greenend.org.uk
	[193.201.200.170])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D3AC043F85; Wed,  4 Jun 2003 01:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fanf@chiark.greenend.org.uk)
Received: by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with local
	id 19NTeA-0007FY-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:29:26 +0100
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:29:26 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20030604082926.GL18938@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <20030603144225.GH18938@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
	<20030604113229.A41800@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030604113229.A41800@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Sed substitution bugs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 08:29:28 -0000

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:32:29AM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
> 
> The patch looks fine, but it isn't obvious to me that the second part
> (handling the /nnn bits) is correct. It seems to produce the right output
> though.

The if clause that I added is a counterpart to the rm_so == rm_eo case
in the /g code. I'll commit the patch with a regression test.

Thanks for looking at it.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
COLWYN BAY TO THE MULL OF GALLOWAY INCLUDING THE ISLE OF MAN: SOUTH BACKING
SOUTHEAST 2 OR 3 LOCALLY 4, VEERING SOUTHWEST 4 OR 5 LATER. CLOUDY, PERIOD
RAIN THEN SHOWERS, DRY, FAIR LATER. GOOD FALLING MODERATE IN RAIN OR SHOWERS.
SLIGHT INCREASING MODERATE.