From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 18:42:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45CE9D0E for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EB77B for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:42:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5229924; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DDDD132CC; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:42:14 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Josh Cepek Subject: Re: 10.1-RELEASE-p1 needs newvers.sh update References: Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:42:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Josh Cepek's message of "Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:36:42 -0600") Message-ID: <8661dj4a9l.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:42:15 -0000 Josh Cepek writes: > FYI, it seems the update to the 'BRANCH' variable in sys/conf/newvers.sh = got=20 > missed in the releng/10.1-RELEASE-p1 branch security release. Thank you. FWIW, freebsd-update users are not affected, since the freebsd-update build scripts automatically update newvers.sh. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no