From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 06:18:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D7916A420; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:18:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saundersconsult@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay101-dav3.bay101.hotmail.com [64.4.56.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A743143D46; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:18:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saundersconsult@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:18:49 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 24.205.176.247 by BAY101-DAV3.phx.gbl with DAV; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:18:49 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [24.205.176.247] X-Originating-Email: [saundersconsult@hotmail.com] X-Sender: saundersconsult@hotmail.com From: "Shawn Saunders" To: "Gleb Smirnoff" References: <20051021053228.GX59364@cell.sick.ru> <20051026141733.GI41520@cell.sick.ru> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:18:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2005 06:18:49.0706 (UTC) FILETIME=[760564A0:01C5DB87] Cc: dionch@freemail.gr, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Trying to make a Host into a gigabit hub for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Shawn Saunders List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:18:50 -0000 I'll test it, but that is what I am seeing now. Shawn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gleb Smirnoff" To: "Shawn Saunders" Cc: ; Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 7:17 AM Subject: Re: Trying to make a Host into a gigabit hub for testing > On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 07:15:18AM -0700, Shawn Saunders wrote: > S> Actually, I think one2many is more appropriate. I do not want the > traffic > S> that is coming in on the incoming ports to be echoed back to them, and > S> isn't that what the ng_hub would do? > > No, it wouldn't. It will send to all ports except of the port the > packet was received on. > > P.S. Please do not top quote. > > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE >