From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 17 08:16:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: smp@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9859D16A401; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DD143D46; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id E465C20A1; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:16:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBACC20A0; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:16:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 75A7EB811; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:16:03 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Kris Kennaway References: <20060417051440.GB60956@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:16:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20060417051440.GB60956@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:14:40 -0400") Message-ID: <86mzekbosc.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: smp@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Anomalous performance increase from mutex profiling X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:16:09 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > However, even with CVS sources I found something very odd: when > MUTEX_PROFILING is compiled in but not enabled (which usually still > makes things slower), I see a clear 38% +/- 3% performance *increase* > on this benchmark. Heisenberg strikes! Heisenberg strikes! Heisenberg strikes! You are uncertain. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no