From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 22 06:43:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E4037B401 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dentrita.perpels.com (95.Red-217-126-9.pooles.rima-tde.net [217.126.9.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5DA43FB1 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 06:43:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drio@perpels.com) Received: from big.perpels.com (unknown [192.168.0.5]) by dentrita.perpels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF6B45 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:43:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by big.perpels.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81109531C; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:43:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:43:24 +0200 From: David Rio To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030722134324.GA77054@perpels.com> References: <20030722103319.GA75950@perpels.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030722103319.GA75950@perpels.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Branches new doc? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:43:37 -0000 Thanks for all the answers. Now I have get it. All you were right, as always, all the information was out there. Thanks again. On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:33:19PM +0200, David Rio wrote: > Hi all: > > I thought I have already understood the FreeBSD source control system > but during this days I have discover that I was wrong. > > Normally I use FreeBSD on production machines so I install 4.7 or 4.8. > Finally I decided to install FreeBSD on my new laptop and I thougth > that 5.1 would be the best option. > After install it, I wanted to update the sources against the central > repository. I thought, what will be the best branch to follow for me? > -STABLE. But after some readings I discovered that there is no such > Branch for 5.1. So if I install 5.1 I just can follow -CURRENT or > the patch branch. > After travel against the central repository using cvsweb, I realize > that there are branchs that I didn't know about. > > So, in conclusion, don't you think there is a lack of documentation > about this topic? If not, please point me to the rigth documentation > because it is crucial for me to understand all about this topic. > > Thanks and apologize if this is not the right place to put this. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"