From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Apr 19 18:44:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC3FD45897; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:44:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [96.47.65.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E30B3A17; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24A9410A7DB; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:44:20 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com Cc: current Subject: Re: new problem? Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:17:55 -0700 Message-ID: <3034917.2qhsWDdZ0Z@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-STABLE; KDE/4.14.10; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.baldwin.cx); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:44:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:44:27 -0000 On Sunday, April 09, 2017 06:08:04 PM Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > i386_set_ldt: start=-1 num=1 descs=0x38449fac This message is a harmless debug printf. Somehow you compiled sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.c with 'DEBUG' defined to enable it though. (The message is not enabled by default.) > Tons of those, eight at a time, newly spamming /var/log/messages, maybe after a > fsck_ffs -y the partitions after a crash, that fixed it, > > as in > df > df output, then eight of the above line with the hex values varying only > ls > ls output, then eight of the above line with the hex values varying only > ...................................... > 2nd problem > persistent LOR in [several] > > nvidia_os:c:662, 824 > > [dmesg only, above, ] > > vfs_mount.c:1277 > ffs_softdep.c:1908 > vfs_subr.c:2600, 2150, > ffs_vnops.c:280 > vfs_bio.c:3500 > ufs_dirhash.c:281 > vfs_syscalls.c:3364 > > [some above also in dmesg, most in /var/log/messages... There are several known LORs in the VFS/UFS code that are either false positives or ones that have effectively been harmless. -- John Baldwin