From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Dec 11 14:56:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA5837B401 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:56:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from fubar.adept.org (fubar.adept.org [63.147.172.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D94843E4A for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:56:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@adept.org) Received: by fubar.adept.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8897F15247; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:53:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fubar.adept.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8797815213 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:53:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 14:53:06 -0800 (PST) From: Mike Hoskins To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sharing files within a cluster In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021211144337.W83455-100000@fubar.adept.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG First, apologies to the list... I admit I'm an avid BSD Biggot. However, that's a posistion that has formed over time based upon real world experience... On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Ronald G. Minnich wrote: > who cares? You maybe ought to find out why linux is in the name before > spouting. Did you even bother reading the web page or docs? I doubt it. Yes. I stated precisely who may care as well (clarified below), but you did not give me the common courtesy of reading my response before replying. > Your note is the sort of typical nonsense you find on mailing lists > though. So I'll stop here. Don't take personal offense, I believe my point was valid. Namely, some may be turned off by things with specific OS/vendor identifications in the name... I've seen these things hurt both opensource and more closed group projects. (I'm at an ASP going through a potential merger now, so have to deal with some of these types of politics daily.) Now, granted, there's really nothing we can do about that, BUT I think it's fairly obvious to see that names can either hurt or help "community" efforts. That was my point. In general, if I developed something (and it'd likely be under FreeBSD these days unless Solaris' opensource campaign quickly turns around and I need robust threading), I would keep the name as generic as possible. Just a difference of opinion, I suppose... But then if some Linux folks wanted to adopt it, they wouldn't be stuck with FreeBSDfoo. Is that really such a shocking ideology? -- Mike Hoskins This message is RFC 1855 compliant, mike@adept.org www.adept.org/pub/rfcs/rfc1855.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message