Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:44:11 +0200 From: Jakub Klama <jakub.klama@uj.edu.pl> To: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Refactored interrupt handling on ARM Message-ID: <246c2ef842c2b47eb2400c1f700ad441@uj.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <534C5A6A.1090707@freebsd.org> References: <3e7f866f4bc774975ae3c85e0df78ec2@uj.edu.pl> <53418D13.7030107@freebsd.org> <534C0F48.2090302@freebsd.org> <f2bebfa812ecb70f423b6be4779b217b@uj.edu.pl> <534C5A6A.1090707@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:00:10 -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > I had deliberately made it private with the last round of interrupt > changes. The idea was to rely completely on newbus for interrupt > mapping. Having a public interface allows code to bypass the bus > hierarchy, which usually isn't a good thing. This ended up happening > all over the place on PowerPC, for example. This made a lot of > drivers > less MI than they should have been and took a lot of time to get rid > of. Agree. In fact, we can completely remove FDT_MAP_IRQ macro, as well as FDT_INTR_MAX. Jakub
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?246c2ef842c2b47eb2400c1f700ad441>