Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:35:23 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Chris" <chrcoluk@gmail.com> Cc: Peter <petermatulis@yahoo.ca>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Disappointed with version 6.0 Message-ID: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNCEIFFDAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0603142300i26d87a09q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Chris >Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 11:00 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: Peter; freebsd-questions >Subject: Re: Disappointed with version 6.0 > > >Sounds harsh, a low end board may have performance problems and less >capability but it shouldnt justify an operating system not working, or >are only high end boards supported? > You could ask Microsoft the same question. I've had Windows systems unstable due to crappy motherboards. Sometimes you just got to face it that crap is crap. With motherboards you simply don't know how they are going to work until you try them. I don't see why this is harsh though, the retailer simply returns the board to the manufacturer, who has to deal with problems that they caused. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNCEIFFDAA.tedm>