Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 22:37:28 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: adam@vectors.cx, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Oh No! __sF undefined -> bump all major number of all libraries Message-ID: <20021013053728.GA6176@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20021012.201917.43022148.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200210130143.g9D1hk8S008000@hammer.village.org> <20021013021627.GA76789@vectors.cx> <20021012.201917.43022148.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 08:19:17PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Yes. libc.so changed its ABI to not encode sizeof(FILE) into every > binary. __sF was depricated at that time (something like a year or > two ago). >=20 > Maybe it is only a problem for -current, since libc.so.4 is good, and > .5 is a use at your own risk sort of thing. So maybe the right answer > is 'never mind' and file it under 'the dangers of running -current'. The real question is whether this will affect people upgrading from RELENG_4. If it causes problems for people tracking -current, that's too bad (this kind of situation occurs regularly, e.g. when we upgrade the C++ compiler). Kris --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9qQaXWry0BWjoQKURApafAKCO1og17Rr3XD2GpNV0bARY7r5BfgCgnrFh bpJXjQPtR8eIL1ZQS7vKQyo= =ct0x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021013053728.GA6176>