From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Jan 18 16:22:02 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA29732
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 16:22:02 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA29713
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 16:21:53 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from imp@village.org)
Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1)
	id 0xu4y3-0002FK-00; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 17:21:31 -0700
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA00975 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 1998 17:21:29 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <199801190021.RAA00975@harmony.village.org>
To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Docs for bsd.ports.mk
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 17:21:29 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Is it time to expand the docs for bsd.ports.mk?  While many of my
questions are answered in the source, "man ports" would be a better
place for much of the information enshrined in
/usr/share/mk/bsd.ports.mk.  I'd be happy to do the typing and submit
the changes to someone.  I'm asking "is it a good idea?" right now.

So is it?

Warner