From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 13 20:15:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA8716A42A for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEB543D46 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:15:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07F3D3FFB1 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:15:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:15:37 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: ZjBjY/QD5leaTTp0Yjbe9V/hOgDnehD6vlbSYGI/2PAk 1142280936 Received: from gumby.localdomain (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BD44CD for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:15:36 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:15:31 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <17428.48090.416936.142264@roam.psg.com> <200603122035.10272.donaldjoneill@gmail.com> <17428.56461.451976.293083@roam.psg.com> In-Reply-To: <17428.56461.451976.293083@roam.psg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603132015.36720.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: portmanager confusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:15:46 -0000 On Monday 13 March 2006 02:44, Randy Bush wrote: > >> two questions > >> > >> o how do i tell portmanager to force the single port, and > >> not everything on which it depends as in -f? > >> > >> o why did portmanager not rebuild in the following case. > >> as i can not force, then who is responsible to see ports > > > > with changes are rebuilt? > > > > Take a look at the acroread Makefile and you'll see why you can't do > > anything with it. > > ok, so i am in the midst of the disgusting incantations for acroread. > This is a red-herring, all you need do is agree to the terms when prompted.