Date: Thu, 12 Jan 95 12:03:03 EST From: dayton@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu (Dayton Clark) To: bmk@dtr.com Cc: eblood@winky.reno.nv.us, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SLIP vs PPP Message-ID: <9501121703.AA28621@sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu> In-Reply-To: <199501091009.CAA26155@dtr.com> (bmk@dtr.com)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<.> From: bmk@dtr.com <.> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 1995 02:09:06 -0800 (PST) <.> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org <.> Reply-To: bmk@dtr.com <.> Mime-Version: 1.0 <.> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII <.> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <.> Content-Length: 626 <.> Precedence: bulk <.> <.> <.> > I've been unable to resolve me earlier problem with my SLIP connection. Before <.> > I do switch to PPP, does PPP work in 2.0? I vaguely remember that there was <.> > some problem and that people should wait. Is this true? Are there any patches <.> > if this is the case? <.> <.> It does work under 2.0R. There were some problems with panics and <.> spontaneous reboots, but there's a one line patch that fixes it. I <.> applied the patch two weeks ago and have had zero problems since. <.> <.> It's so reliable now, SOMETHING must be wrong.. :) <.> <.> If you can't find the patch anywhere, send me some mail and I'll see if <.> I can find it in my archives. <.> <.> I've looked for the patch without success, could you send it to me? thanks dayton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9501121703.AA28621>