Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:59:03 -0800 (PST)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Mikel King <mikel@ocsinternet.com>
Cc:        Chrisy Luke <chrisy@flix.net>, Julian Elischer <julian@vicor-nb.com>, net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: RFC: ipfirewall_forward patch
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111161157490.6632-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BF51DC8.A2AC1549@ocsinternet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A "doddle" is "a task so easy  that you could do it in your sleep"

(BTW the patch has a small bug.. but the fix is trivial.)


On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Mikel King wrote:

> Just curious, but what's a doddle?
> 
> Cheers,
> mikel
> 
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Chrisy Luke wrote:
> > > > > only packets already leaving the system can be hijacked and forwarded
> > > > > to a 2nd machine. Incoming packets can only be forwarded to local
> > > > > addresses/port combinations.
> > >
> > > My fault. I was being lazy when I wrote it. :)
> >
> > Ah it WAS you I committed it for wasn't it? :-)
> >
> > >
> > > > > This patch would allow a sequence of mchines to hijack
> > > > > a particular conforming packet and pass it allong a chain of
> > > > > these machine sot make it fall out somewhere else..
> > >
> > > It looks good. The ipfw syntax doesn't quite make sense to me.
> >
> > They all have different bits masked by  the netmask..
> >
> > > Also, are you requiring that they all be on the same ipfw rule number?
> >
> > No, I was lazy..
> > (cut'n'pasted the rules)
> >
> > >
> > > Writing a script to probe a serving host and alter ipfw rules could be
> > > done seamlessly if they were on seperate ipfw rules.
> >
> > well sure.. it's the mechanism not the details I was looking at..
> > Can you check my logic on the changes.?
> > I'll be testing it more tonight..
> >
> > >
> > > With a similar trick to move aliases around on a primary ether port,
> > > it's going to be a doddle to setup a clustered-transparent loadbalancer
> > > in FreeBSD now. Neat. :)
> >
> > that's the theory..
> >
> > Why make a huge complicated program to do it when
> > you can do it with ipfw :-)
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Chris.
> > > --
> > > == chris@easynet.net                                    T: +44 845 333 0122
> > > == Global IP Network Engineering, Easynet Group PLC     F: +44 845 333 0122
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> > >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0111161157490.6632-100000>