From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 28 10:20:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CEC106568D for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonyt@logyst.com) Received: from smtp.webfaction.com (mail6.webfaction.com [74.55.86.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07A68FC26 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f194.google.com (mail-pz0-f194.google.com [209.85.222.194]) by smtp.webfaction.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5C91C71B06; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:20:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: by pzk32 with SMTP id 32so2435753pzk.3 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:20:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.202.12 with SMTP id z12mr133388rvf.112.1254133223333; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:20:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:20:23 +1000 Message-ID: <22166b750909280320r3356c113l8d54e46279f2742f@mail.gmail.com> From: Tony Theodore To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why no SAP nor DB2 on FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:20:26 -0000 2009/9/28 Ivan Voras > Saifi Khan wrote: > > Hi all: > > > > In continuation of my investigation of Oracle, i also noticed > > that there is: > > . no SAP for FreeBSD > > . no DB2 for FreeBSD > > . no Sybase ASE for FreeBSD > > . no Informix for FreeBSD > > > > Discouing PostgreSql installations, effectively enterprise > > database setups have given FreeBSD a miss. > > What could be reason for this ? > > An obvious guess would be that the userbase is too small and that makes > it unprofitable to support the products on FreeBSD. > > Which then leads the FreeBSD community to give those products a miss and use alternatives, or find ways of running them without vendor support, which further reduces demand. I guess from an advocacy perspective, it's hard to get enthused about this as the alternatives seem more attractive. It's not like hardware drivers that do constrain usage and development. Tony