From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr 22 04:19:58 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17773
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 04:19:58 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA17765
          ; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 04:19:53 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id EAA04851; Sat, 22 Apr 1995 04:19:43 -0700
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 1995 04:19:43 -0700
Message-Id: <199504221119.EAA04851@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com
CC: core@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <7091.798406245@freefall.cdrom.com> (jkh@freefall.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: pkg_add mimic code?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I'll take editors, lang, devel and games.

Sorry, as I said in another mail, I already did editors and games....

 * I think so too - and the overall simplification we gain in those
 * Makefiles will make it a lot easier for others to understand and
 * improve them later.  This is a win.

 :)

 * Maybe you should just take the scary cases and let the ports-grunts
 * do ALL the easy ones?  This would seem to me to be a better division
 * of effort..

Well, this will only work if people start fixing the Makefiles and
bounce me the ones they can't figure out...if I try to go in and fix
all the scary ones first, I need to see which they are, and then it's
too easy for me to convert everything along the way.... ;)

Satoshi