From owner-freebsd-audit  Fri Jan 26 15:19:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org
Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F4F37B401
	for <FreeBSD-audit@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 15:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grondar.za (root@gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133])
	by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0QNIYW08509;
	Sat, 27 Jan 2001 01:18:39 +0200 (SAST)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.za)
Message-Id: <200101262318.f0QNIYW08509@gratis.grondar.za>
To: Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>
Cc: FreeBSD-audit <FreeBSD-audit@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: lam(1) patch 
References: <XFMail.20010126145413.mheffner@vt.edu> 
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20010126145413.mheffner@vt.edu> ; from Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>  "Fri, 26 Jan 2001 14:54:13 EST."
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 01:18:50 +0200
From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> On 26-Jan-2001 Mark Murray wrote:
> |> | While you are in there, you probably also want to blow away the "register"
> |> | keyword(s) on the lines you are messing with.
> |> | 
> |> 
> |> Well I removed one register variable completely because it was no longer
> |> needed, but I hadn't touched any other variables. Should I remove "register"
> |> from some of the other variables?
> | 
> | Yeah. Why not? :-)

OK! Looks good!

I'd say "commit", and while your are about it, nuke _all_ of the "registers".

M
-- 
Mark Murray
Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message