From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Oct 10 05:29:51 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA10659 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 05:29:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc8.ihf.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.90.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA10653 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 05:29:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de [134.130.90.6]) by ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA04110 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:29:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from thomas@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id OAA08617; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 14:29:10 +0200 (CEST) To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: SWIG vs. swig From: Thomas Gellekum Date: 10 Oct 1997 14:29:09 +0200 Message-ID: <877mbliyy2.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Lines: 6 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Moin, why do we have two ports for swig? SWIG seems to be older, swig doesn't have an entry in devel/Makefile, so which one's the one? tg