Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:11:31 +0100 From: FreeBSD Core Secretary <core-secretary@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <a99a2d1e-04d5-3d07-8f16-56013ea5af90@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <d9aca4bc-0371-59f4-d6b4-eea19130c380@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> <20161024155111.GB15256@lonesome.com> <d9aca4bc-0371-59f4-d6b4-eea19130c380@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8EvV4e16nvJKF7X7E2RjLGFJduP8DdrH5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="53r6EsfgwmefOEcLswvS7nXw7wvLkSevQ"; protected-headers="v1" From: FreeBSD Core Secretary <core-secretary@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <a99a2d1e-04d5-3d07-8f16-56013ea5af90@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> <20161024155111.GB15256@lonesome.com> <d9aca4bc-0371-59f4-d6b4-eea19130c380@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <d9aca4bc-0371-59f4-d6b4-eea19130c380@aldan.algebra.com> --53r6EsfgwmefOEcLswvS7nXw7wvLkSevQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24/10/2016 17:11, Mikhail T. wrote: > Now that we are done with the hairsplitting, and I shall put the port > back as soon as I have a moment -- unless someone else beats me to it. >=20 > I'd also like to ask portmgr@ to avoid taking such steps in the future > -- inventing a policy in order to immediately act on it. Though we do > not have a strict separation of powers, portmgr@ is primarily an > executive body -- and should defer "lawmaking" to the wider audience of= > committers, however cantankerous we may be. >=20 > Portmgr's mandate is to ensure, ports continue to build smoothly despit= e > changes to the OS and other ports. Policing the contents is a > regrettable overreach (a.k.a. "powergrab"). Hi, Mikhail and everyone else involved here, The misc/jive port was actually removed at the request of core@. Please can you raise your concerns with core privately, rather than letting this thread get out of hand (as it seems likely to do) in public. Cheers, Matthew, with hat core-secretary. --53r6EsfgwmefOEcLswvS7nXw7wvLkSevQ-- --8EvV4e16nvJKF7X7E2RjLGFJduP8DdrH5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYDk7iXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRDMDdCRjVFMzEwQUU2NEJGNjEyMEIwRjYz NkE3QzA1RkUxRUNGOUJCAAoJEDanwF/h7Pm7QS4P/j3KwLh35dqCeZ1kr46ycD4s cFByOdj2UA8YJSK97P/JuGseOXypOBEkCddQPt3ENvDpRov9AwTEaA54VWHtj84x q/Hje+H2OusiyqgfAkor/dq9aSpAgJtm3XqPcptbUCun1xIhVghsYRZ9CmX3qjJM 9zxb1/eqVYF6Vm7UkCiLG6gQIVeVl4Nf2RuTbOvghqYkEJqkvEeeHcgnCNEd5EYh SVLbnFzddLlr96Tn/NK2DPxhG6hgEGzYZlY3rABQnRvL9UdXxlSFkLJCFrxMzg3S muVVIwUYxHCbX9TQgtViaiJUwqWmv8FxDP5SZFZNffi6gGpLCzRwHNtQjZqEfMM8 bluuhNIZg2MF/XaWK2ONbNg4xo6jPNf0k5X1vJ7s4+PwWxsBdzCcF1Egp2khEqul yfpbBWmfb6un8lS8kYgDmNNsF76IyFQB287iJEJQd6U3M7gtHxNAjWgpI62SDd+z 1Gz+HmGXolMGWEIEtLbuwowHRyZ4I2IhrlVyNQdRGrXY3dLqi72Y37A+8224LzdJ ca5h7n5W+gUnuQMgPC/Y7qd3866Yvc+YoR8QNVgdKMyS8vWbhNoS/cEqQ/ctwuXw hlnTKbFIG7juLBFjjhciWC/wODcz89WiZovOJS21mLT0Tt95To/oMxTVdriv+Z0e 5RKQG/eQRyIjR03QHGR0 =2VT7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8EvV4e16nvJKF7X7E2RjLGFJduP8DdrH5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a99a2d1e-04d5-3d07-8f16-56013ea5af90>