From owner-cvs-ports Tue Aug 8 06:49:04 1995 Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id GAA29106 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 06:49:04 -0700 Received: from Shug-Internet.Saar.DE (shug-internet.saar.de [192.109.53.4]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA29096 ; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 06:48:48 -0700 Received: from TMPuhf.Saar.DE (tmpuhf.saar.de [192.109.53.3]) by Shug-Internet.Saar.DE (8.6.8.1/8.5) with SMTP id PAA20429; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 15:47:27 +0200 Received: by TMPuhf.Saar.DE (Smail3.1.28.1 #1) id m0sfp08-000213C; Tue, 8 Aug 95 15:47 WET DST Message-Id: From: torstenb@tmpuhf.saar.de (Torsten Blum) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/fvwm Makefile To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 15:47:24 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: <199508081235.FAA10044@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Aug 8, 95 05:35:09 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 395 Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Shouldn't that be done by xmkmf -a? > > I dunno. I just assumed that since the original porter put an > "XMKMF=xmkmf" in there, there is some reason why the fvwm source > didn't like the "-a". > > Torsten, what do you think? yes, I tried that, but it failed: make depend make: don't know how to make depend. Stop *** Error code 2 I don't like imake... :) - tb