From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 16 11:15:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74020106568C for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de) Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064128FC17 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de) Received: from [192.168.1.194] (p508FF550.dip.t-dialin.net [80.143.245.80]) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9771C0B4044; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:15:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michael_T=FCxen?= To: Bruce Simpson In-Reply-To: <49E70AD5.8000700@incunabulum.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.4) Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:15:19 +0200 References: <49E5D4CF.8050707@incunabulum.net> <822B17FC-60E1-4F19-8E62-BB2E5351CB99@lurchi.franken.de> <49E67988.2020008@incunabulum.net> <0A42378E-1193-41B4-964D-C1A4E4632616@lurchi.franken.de> <49E70AD5.8000700@incunabulum.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.4) Cc: FreeBSD Net , Robin Seggelmann Subject: Re: OpenSSL DTLS bug fix patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:15:23 -0000 On Apr 16, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Bruce Simpson wrote: > Michael T=FCxen wrote: >> On Apr 16, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote: >> ... >>> >>> That's excellent news, and these fixes look good, but I was more =20 >>> wondering if this drop would be in FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE :-) >> I know, but I wanted to make the state of the patches clear to make >> the decision for the port maintainer easier. >> >> Are you using DTLS? > > Not yet, but I came across these patches whilst researching TLS =20 > adaptation for SCTP. Ahh, I see. Even more interesting. If you try our DTLS/SCTP =20 implementation, please let us know if it works for you or if you have any questions... > > > cheers, > BMS >