From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 27 00:32:52 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475EC106566B
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:32:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com)
Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (ip-2-2-0-2.r20.asbnva02.us.ce.gin.ntt.net
	[IPv6:2001:418:0:5000::16])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD028FC0C
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:32:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wonderland.m5p.com (wonderland.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::19])
	by mailhost.m5p.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1R0Wigr062556
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:32:49 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com)
Message-ID: <4F4ACF2C.50300@m5p.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:32:44 -0500
From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:9.0) Gecko/20120122 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <4F2F7B7F.40508@FreeBSD.org> <4F366E8F.9060207@FreeBSD.org>
	<4F367965.6000602@FreeBSD.org> <4F396B24.5090602@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1202131012270.2020@desktop>
	<4F3978BC.6090608@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1202131108460.2020@desktop>
	<4F3990EA.1080002@FreeBSD.org> <4F3C0BB9.6050101@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1202150949480.2020@desktop>
	<4F3E807A.60103@FreeBSD.org>
	<CACqU3MWEC4YYguPQF_d+_i_CwTc=86hG+PbxFgJQiUS-=AHiRw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F3E8858.4000001@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F3E8858.4000001@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7]);
	Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:32:49 -0500 (EST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7
Subject: Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 00:32:52 -0000

On 02/17/12 12:03, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin<mav@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>> [...]So I believe this code works as it should.
>>>
>>> Here is the patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/sched.htt40.patch
>>>
>>> I plan this to be a final patch of this series (more to come :)) and if
>>> there will be no problems or objections, I am going to commit it (except
>>> some debugging KTRs) in about ten days. So now it's a good time for
>>> reviews
>>> and testing. :)
>>>[...]

I finally got around to trying this on a 9.0-STABLE GENERIC kernel, in
the forlorn hope that it would fix SCHED_ULE's poor performance for
interactive processes with a full load on interactive processes.  It
doesn't help.                                       -- George Mitchell