Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:32:44 -0500 From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only Message-ID: <4F4ACF2C.50300@m5p.com> In-Reply-To: <4F3E8858.4000001@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F2F7B7F.40508@FreeBSD.org> <4F366E8F.9060207@FreeBSD.org> <4F367965.6000602@FreeBSD.org> <4F396B24.5090602@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1202131012270.2020@desktop> <4F3978BC.6090608@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1202131108460.2020@desktop> <4F3990EA.1080002@FreeBSD.org> <4F3C0BB9.6050101@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1202150949480.2020@desktop> <4F3E807A.60103@FreeBSD.org> <CACqU3MWEC4YYguPQF_d%2B_i_CwTc=86hG%2BPbxFgJQiUS-=AHiRw@mail.gmail.com> <4F3E8858.4000001@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/17/12 12:03, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin<mav@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> [...]So I believe this code works as it should. >>> >>> Here is the patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/sched.htt40.patch >>> >>> I plan this to be a final patch of this series (more to come :)) and if >>> there will be no problems or objections, I am going to commit it (except >>> some debugging KTRs) in about ten days. So now it's a good time for >>> reviews >>> and testing. :) >>>[...] I finally got around to trying this on a 9.0-STABLE GENERIC kernel, in the forlorn hope that it would fix SCHED_ULE's poor performance for interactive processes with a full load on interactive processes. It doesn't help. -- George Mitchell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4ACF2C.50300>