From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jan 16 14:47:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA03742 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:47:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA03708; Fri, 16 Jan 1998 14:46:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA03970; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 09:15:56 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id JAA22524; Sat, 17 Jan 1998 09:15:56 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from grog) Message-ID: <19980117091555.11838@lemis.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 09:15:55 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: John D Duncan Cc: Diana , Das Devaraj , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD UNIX? References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e In-Reply-To: ; from John D Duncan on Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 03:34:56PM -0500 Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 03:34:56PM -0500, John D Duncan wrote: > er, i haven't cared about this question for a few years, but the > last time i checked USL owned the unix name, and are charged > with the responsibility of keeping SysV the only "real" unix. > > Here's a small list of u*ix-like oses: > > Real unix: solaris 2 (sunos 5.4), a/ux, sco, irix (svr3). Current versions of IRIX are SVR4. You need to mention System V here as well. > Fake unix: linux (posix), mach/bsd, 4.3/4 bsd, FreeBSD, > OpenBSD, NetBSD, BSD/OS, Interactive BSD, solaris 1 (sunos 4.x) I've never heard of Interactive BSD. I have used Interactive UNIX. The version I used was a much more conformant version of System V.3.2 than SCO had. I think this belongs in the first group. I also don't like the term "fake UNIX". "Unlicensed UNIX" or "trademark-refused UNIX" would be better. The point is that the versions are derived from a single source. Greg