From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Feb 4 2:55:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E21E37B401 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:55:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from web11803.mail.yahoo.com (web11803.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF5FF43F43 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:55:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wyldephyre2@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030204105530.40332.qmail@web11803.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [211.28.96.5] by web11803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 02:55:30 PST Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:55:30 -0800 (PST) From: Haikal Saadh Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD Ready for the Desktop? To: Scott Mitchell Cc: Johnson David , freebsd-advocacy In-Reply-To: <20030204094337.GA31580@fishballoon.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --- Scott Mitchell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 06:06:19PM -0800, Haikal Saadh wrote: > > Just thought I'd get a word in on this. > > > > Now, I have been able to to convince a few, techincally competent > > friends to try freebsd, with a variety of methods, from logical > > debate to rating and raving to downright sabotage ('Hey you want > to > > install linux, here, try this *slips freebsd disc into tray*. > > Although this only tends to work with *nix n00bs :) ), There was > one > > thing that made me reluctant to sneakily put FreeBSD on the > machine > > of a not really computer-knowledgeable person: The packages that > came > > with 5.0. > > Forgive me if I've missed something jumping into this thread so > late, but > why were you thinking that 5.0 would be good for a not really > computer > knowledgeable person? Surely 4.7, which is rock-solid stable and > comes on > a nice 4-CD set with all the packages you could wish for, would > have been a > better choice? 5.0 may be a release now, but it's not something > I'd > suggest giving to newbies in its present state. > Point. New release fever I guess. I just said 5.0 because that was the ISO I had. I'm starting to thing I did jump the gun, though (with 5.0), what with the adduser bugs and all (Just found that I out because I just tried to login as myself for the first time). __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message