Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:49:15 +0000 From: <Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de> To: <lacombar@gmail.com> Cc: rdivacky@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: make question Message-ID: <611243783F62AF48AFB07BC25FA4B1060BDA03CE@dlrexmbx02.intra.dlr.de> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimro2n5fiOT%2BzcEHe73WZuqPdiQ=g@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110427193946.GA41659@freebsd.org> <20110428174523.I61666@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>, <BANLkTimro2n5fiOT%2BzcEHe73WZuqPdiQ=g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
s/can/can't/ harti ________________________________________ From: Arnaud Lacombe [lacombar@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 3:37 AM To: Brandt, Hartmut Cc: Roman Divacky; hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make question Hi, On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hartmut Brandt <hartmut.brandt@dlr.de> wrote: > I think we can change this, because it would break makefiles that assume > that the entire script is given to the shell in one piece. > I'm not sure to parse that. "We can change it because it would break stuff". That said, if something was to be broken, it would already shows up when using "-j N", and thus should be considered as a bug. - Arnaud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?611243783F62AF48AFB07BC25FA4B1060BDA03CE>