From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 12 11:43:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0489C4; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail-gw11.york.ac.uk (mail-gw11.york.ac.uk [144.32.129.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B879A15B; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk ([144.32.64.162]:38756) by mail-gw11.york.ac.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQcNj-0002tX-FV; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:43:03 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:43:03 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@thunderhorn.york.ac.uk To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: RFC: Changing the documentation's font style. In-Reply-To: <20130412180742.3f2b220a@X220.ovitrap.com> Message-ID: References: <20130412180742.3f2b220a@X220.ovitrap.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:43:05 -0000 On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Erich Dollansky wrote: > On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:41:46 +0100 > Isabell Long wrote: > > > I sent this idea to the #bsddocs IRC channel a few days ago and no-one > > there objected, but here you go. I'd like to know your opinions on the > > documentation font being changed from serif to sans-serif. This would > > only affect the web-based docs, not the ones being prepared for print. > > > > An example of this is at > > http://tau.devrandom.co.uk/issyl0/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ , > > and a diff of my very simple changes is at > > http://tau.devrandom.co.uk/issyl0/docs_font.diff > > > > In my opinion, it makes a hugely positive difference and modernises > > the look of the documentation set. Yes please! > how old are you? > > The serif fonts are easier to read for older people. Online? I personally disagree. > I agree, it looks more modern. But what is the idea behind a > documentation? Look good or being read by people for the content. Both. Content is essential, but I think we need to care far more about style than we currently do. Even small changes like this can massively improve the feel of the website, and pull it, kicking-and-screaming, out of the mid-ninties. Gavin