From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 6 04:44:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5580106564A for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 04:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jshupe@hermetek.com) Received: from monroe.hermetek.com (monroe.hermetek.com [IPv6:2607:f348:1007::1a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664E68FC12 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 04:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alcor.hermetek.com (alcor.hermetek.com [216.172.107.42]) by monroe.hermetek.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q664hmdF069018 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:43:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jshupe@hermetek.com) Received: from [10.45.28.72] (ppp-70-254-33-128.dsl.lgvwtx.swbell.net [70.254.33.128]) by alcor.hermetek.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE7E13B67A for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 23:43:50 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4FF66CFF.8000700@hermetek.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 23:43:43 -0500 From: James Shupe Organization: HermeTek Network Solutions User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-HermeTek-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-HermeTek-MailScanner-ID: AE7E13B67A.A5B6D X-HermeTek-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HermeTek-MailScanner-From: jshupe@hermetek.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: IPSec woes coming from OpenBSD to Free X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 04:44:29 -0000 On 07/05/2012 11:15 PM, Chris Benesch wrote: > It is currently working on OpenBSD, but after all the flack that > came out last year and the fact that I do work in the financial industry, > maybe it is better to have a system without the documented security hole. > Thats a whole other discussion. What documented security hole? The debunked IPsec backdoor allegation, or did I miss something else entirely? -- James Shupe