From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 18 18:58:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6A416A41C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:58:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F341143D4C for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:58:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [82.41.37.55] ([82.41.37.55]) by smtp-out6.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:59:38 +0100 Message-ID: <42B46EF0.1080406@dial.pipex.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:58:56 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050530 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kirk Strauser References: <200506181124.09562.l0kit0@exactas.org> <200506181025.25239.kirk@strauser.com> In-Reply-To: <200506181025.25239.kirk@strauser.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2005 18:59:38.0208 (UTC) FILETIME=[E01F0600:01C57437] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postfix or qmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:58:59 -0000 Kirk Strauser wrote: >My choice is Postfix. It's still under active development and isn't hampered >by bizarre licensing and enormous egos. > > Active development has to be the killer argument. Who wants to rely on software that no-one cares enough about to develop properly? >Furthermore, Qmail seems to have earned its reputation for security the >standard DJB way: by implementing only the easy parts of the standard and >complaining loudly about the hard parts ("those are insecure!") until >everyone quits asking for them. > > DJB? >On Saturday 18 June 2005 10:21 am, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > >> It has some interesting tricks (an email address like "user" can >>> automatically have aliases like "user-*) >> >> > > > Kirk Strauser wrote: >In Postfix's main.cf: > > recipient_delimiter (default: empty) > The separator between user names and address extensions (user+foo). > >I set mine to "+" and use it all the time whenever I give out my address >(although I subscribed to this mailing list before I migrated to Postfix so >you won't see it on my messages here). For example, my listed address on >Slashdot is "kirk+slashdot@strauser.com". > > Learn something every day, thanks! Guess my postfix instinct was justified :-) --Alex