Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 12:35:20 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= <trasz@freebsd.org> Cc: "hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding dehumanize_number to libutil Message-ID: <CAF6rxg=uBp471_g3gFWb0Hza1TVnqBwxc0o28xODfhsU4sV%2BgA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <D0CADF5E-84FD-4B6D-8B66-19C34CCF013C@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAF6rxgms69Jrc3gppLwWCx6PNYVMvW0NVsYYucFDgsmiT=XtMA@mail.gmail.com> <D0CADF5E-84FD-4B6D-8B66-19C34CCF013C@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Edward Tomasz Napiera=C5=82a <trasz@freebsd.org> wrote: > Dnia 7 lis 2013 o godz. 13:56 Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> napisa= =C5=82(a): > >> Hi all, >> >> NetBSD and DragonflyBSD have a function dehumanize_number which is the >> inverse of humanize_number. >> >> I'd like to import this function and switch some base utilities to use >> it. Is there any objection? > > What's the difference between this and expand_number(3)? I forgot about / didn't know we had this. Forget the idea then. --=20 Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxg=uBp471_g3gFWb0Hza1TVnqBwxc0o28xODfhsU4sV%2BgA>