From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 29 01:00:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7249216A41C for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:00:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from khaled.abu@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306EE43D1F for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:00:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from khaled.abu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so710200wra for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:00:41 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ZaGiFBLrJOPYbj3XJ5DSCYWs8OvfyReFdtOqtWfzS+zLf7AcQegqme34ZESNiORkk2sFbVjM+IfO/oyt8/95V87Bim2fHcgf2lNbjLuANjjAue2+g4wzGyky/XYLijot2XsRiLVhwZh+/r39iU2+yykK4oLz0D8BsvL/ecC0sdY= Received: by 10.54.7.32 with SMTP id 32mr7160wrg; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.16 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:00:41 +0300 From: Abu Khaled To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: portmanager and perl threaded X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Abu Khaled List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:00:43 -0000 I have a situation here where portmanager treats perl-threaded-5.8.7 as an old port and tries to update it. -snip have:perl-threaded-5.8.7 status: OLD available:perl-5.8.7 /lang/perl5.8 -snip Portmanager almost recompiled my entire ports tree and I was lucky to stop it before it uninstalled perl-threaded-5.8.7 Portupgrade correctly reports that the port is up-to-date but I wanted to test portmanager and see how it differs from portupgrade. Can someone give me a workaround for this problem? What options do I need to add for portmanager configuration aside from IGNORE? --=20 Kind regards Abu Khaled