From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 5 19:22:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51ED316A4F2; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1422C43D72; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8ED34E70; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:22:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 14:22:45 -0500 To: michael johnson Message-ID: <20060905192245.GC8865@soaustin.net> References: <20060905163409.GA63018@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , scrappy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD stats project: what about packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:22:46 -0000 On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 12:53:03PM -0400, michael johnson wrote: > freshports.org could also give you a good idea of whats popular. It does -- of the sample population of people that know about it. (fwiw, it also has a lot of stale entries, as people don't keep their lists up to date.) Of course, the _interesting_ question to ask is "what ports are unused by anybody", which neither of these sampling technologies will answer, unfortunately. mcl