From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Feb 27 12:05:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA19761
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 12:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA19750
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 12:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA04071; Tue, 27 Feb 1996 12:02:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199602272002.MAA04071@precipice.shockwave.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes), nathan@netrail.net,
        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IPv6 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Feb 1996 08:42:37 +0100."
             <199602270742.IAA01109@keltia.freenix.fr> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 1996 12:02:44 -0800
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

I've heard very good thinks about the NRL implementation (over Mr. Dupont's),
and I believe that Garrett has the current code).  Please, this is all third-
hand, I intend no criticism towards Mr. Dupont's code,  I'm just relaying
additional info.

I think that someone should do an evaluation of "which is better" before taking
the first one.  (Actually, I guess the criteria should be, which is the one
the other BSD's are taking.  BSDI appears to be going with NRL, and I'm not
sure about NetBSD's).