From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Dec 10 22:07:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE909D70F8 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F1E1FBE for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u63so42450289wmu.0 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=multiplay-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9958bTxCqPxNI3gPHirF4sYPuTCxHuHmbnxZH771pMM=; b=t8leky1d+Vj+VAy908cYhS8+i75uPt5qeT5N+i9N6K6YlvmW2yD/Y/S3/X4uuOmCYZ 3VzrL/KIsFwiFE9L56cCJfaReSaMzZVTWsuiXi+rw2l3/NMIvV0n3V7J4HO00ee53H0F 5vhuL0NcEvyU9uUfIuBVw7TxveOE5VbC1bSsCkstp84eIa5mncnY7vuiCugoJsWMKxOy l4IZ8xf+WXSo9oQZh9n4RGPQcU5dzLZgV93zHfcNQxt261yPMIYmYWoPNxi1bQIyIGhD 6WSRZc3P8GBgoPN7LZG25rcChV/7HFbYh/YADCw+VpZVBO3seektZR7yMU+xVIlnrBDn kk/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9958bTxCqPxNI3gPHirF4sYPuTCxHuHmbnxZH771pMM=; b=QnEFr2rrhA5U3uNDaPRHiivLVT95k/fKCsKq/RIVTDVBRPULRtW53neeq/4WbeDOek GTKtA7ksPPmNNYso4FGMpi9sWkDXbP1H0ZKsbH2t05AUZW4LmtAoczwiMnDIVSdfhApB pZ4FatFfu9i6BKECCY6IZo0hbRGYagdVxUkpBCG9H6R1ubAYVA+XegqK+lzuuidlAwgU IQut4AaRmVyDEVe13f1cT9gnB/1glBCAKrCT7TDMSKbrrNIdZTlMfW7+U4IN9qqjOUTq X6ozFzx+ylldoFvXIL4ateQM1BqVRAU0oEx2FYYAePpAe0ikbKzWucPysu4adAUMts8a 7h5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXaliYDvgIBVmXS1wix2VSqeabICM/Rhk9f/hbfiNjbRN1CeNVi6HdjYr+92YkHLnRah8kO51q6yTj6WtLMJxGueD1NA== X-Received: by 10.28.147.203 with SMTP id v194mr1518314wmd.16.1449785272988; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.58] (liv3d.labs.multiplay.co.uk. [82.69.141.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 198sm661515wmr.18.2015.12.10.14.07.51 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:07:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: EFI/ZFS Update: successful tests, need more complex vdevs To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <5669C3BD.4010402@multiplay.co.uk> From: Steven Hartland Message-ID: <5669F7B8.7030706@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:07:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5669C3BD.4010402@multiplay.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 22:07:55 -0000 I have to take it back, while single disk worked fine as soon as we tried raidz2 we get: Initializing modules: ZFS UFS ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable ZFS: can't find root dsl_dir ZFS: can't find root filesystem ... So some more work to be done yet it seems. On 10/12/2015 18:26, Steven Hartland wrote: > We've used Eric's hard work which is currently under review here: > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4104 > > I'm pleased to report we can now successfully EFI boot root ZFS from a > raidz2 pool on Intel P3700 NVMe drives :) > > Here's a guide for those interested: > http://blog.multiplay.co.uk/2015/12/freebsd-10-2-release-efi-zfs-root-boot/ > > > On 04/11/2015 12:35, krad wrote: >> is there not anyway freebsd could provide patched signed binaries >> outside >> the main distros for testing purposes, as it should be fairly straight >> forward to drop them in? I think you might be a much bigger audience for >> testing then? >> >> On 2 November 2015 at 19:16, Gabor Radnai >> wrote: >> >>> Appreciate, thank you very much. I think my confusion is because the >>> latest >>> patch you provided on the list >>> on *Fri Oct 23 11:19:07 UTC 2015* >>> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20151023/db1ac571/attachment.bin >>> >>> >>> is not a full patch but a diff to your original patch. Anyhow, I'm >>> ok now >>> applying original patch and this latest diff everything seems fine >>> (apart that for some reason my server dislikes booting automatically >>> from >>> the EFI partition, manually loading bootx64.efi works like charm. >>> but that's definitely nothing to do with your great work). >>> >>> Thanks. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >