From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Apr 21 14:13:12 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA07569
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 14:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA07564
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 14:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA06027; Sun, 21 Apr 1996 14:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject: Re: Another 2.2-SNAP soon, folks? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 Apr 1996 20:15:42 +0200."
             <199604211815.UAA14692@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 14:11:34 -0700
Message-ID: <6024.830121094@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> This would leave the question whether we should enable it on the
> install floppy or not.  I'd say not, to prevent people from running
> into a chicken-and-egg problem, but i realize that it won't be tested
> very extensively then.  Many people seem to run the GENERIC kernel now
> that we've got UserConfig and dset(8). :-/

I think you may be speaking about something else - I was just
referring to his changes which support more members of the Adaptec
family (th 7890 I think?  Some weird on-board thing anyway).

> I could try to see if i can come up with some better fdisk (or
> replacement tool), but i don't make any promises.

I wouldn't fight you on this one.. :-)

					Jordan