From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Fri Sep 22 13:40:17 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB1FE296DD
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:40:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org)
Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D021B6C867;
 Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org)
Received: from [192.168.0.66] (unknown [88.184.223.108])
 by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CEAB00525;
 Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:40:13 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Failed to build a port (tempus) on i386 (Boost problems?)
To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <e1765b3c-d5b8-8f8a-a929-d06f8b8e7d79@tuxfamily.org>
 <F1179D90-D122-4528-BD12-F1D4FD2647FB@FreeBSD.org>
From: "L.Bartoletti" <lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org>
Message-ID: <a852bc94-f6b7-61da-79a5-456b717918d0@tuxfamily.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:40:13 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F1179D90-D122-4528-BD12-F1D4FD2647FB@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:40:17 -0000

Hi Dimitry,

Unfortunately, It can't compile with USE_CXXSTD or when force CMake to 
use c++11.

Maybe a bug with boost?

Anyway, according with the developer using this tools on i386 can be 
problematic.

Regards.

On 11.09.2017 23:52, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2017, at 22:39, L.Bartoletti <lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org> wrote:
>> I'm trying to port the tempus <https://gitlab.com/Oslandia/> framework on FreeBSD. All packages are nearly ready except the core for i386...
>>
>> I come to you because I don't understand the difference of the logs between i386 and amd64. I suspect some clang errors and maybe boost, but not sure of myself.
>>
>> Tempus_core requires c++11. So, I have tested with c++11-lang and c++11-lib without success.
> As far as I can see from the logs, your program still needs to add
> -std=c++11 (or -std=gnu++11) to its compilation flags.  Either the
> program's configure or cmake scripts should do this, or you could use
> USE_CXXSTD=c++11.
>
>
>> I find a (dirty) solution for 10amd64: force the compiler to be clang40. Unfortunately, it doesn't work on i386...
> Not sure why that would be needed. You should be able to compile C++11
> code on 10.x just fine.
>
>
>> All my tests are on my gitlab <https://gitlab.com/lbartoletti/freebsd_ports/tree/master/tempus_log>, containing ports and logs.
> These logs contain errors caused by -std=c++11 missing from the
> compilation flags.  Add that flag to get rid of them.
>
> -Dimitry
>