Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:05:03 -0600
From:      Chris <racerx@makeworld.com>
To:        "J.D. Bronson" <jbronson@wixb.com>
Cc:        "matt ." <fasterdisco@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Yesterday's -STABLE kernel corrupts LAN
Message-ID:  <4388CDFF.4090203@makeworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20051126145004.00c17008@sixcompanies.com>
References:  <20051126182651.A966@www.pukruppa.net>	<43889E27.2010209@makeworld.com>	<20051126185500.I966@www.pukruppa.net>	<4388A349.9080808@makeworld.com> <4388A5B0.6070005@mainframe.ca>	<4388A6E4.1040206@makeworld.com> <4388C27A.8090601@vfs.com>	<a97e11c20511261245l2e147b76u349fa57bfcaf359d@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20051126145004.00c17008@sixcompanies.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
J.D. Bronson wrote:
> At 02:45 PM 11/26/2005, matt . wrote:
> 
>> Wow I must be missing something here on a very basic, fundamental level.
>>
>> I run FreeBSD-RELEASE on a production box.  I have my reservations but it
>> was the only release that supported my RAID controller, so I had no
>> choice
>> (or buy a $300 raid card that was supported).  Anyway it works fine so
>> far
>> (knock heavily and repeatedly on huge pieces of wood).
>>
>> I've read the FreeBSD notes regarding the differences between STABLE,
>> CURRENT and RELEASE.  So uh, what is supposed to be run on a production
>> box?  In plain sight on the FreeBSD site it says "Latest production
>> release"
>> which is 6.0-RELEASE...are we only supposed to run RELEASE on production
>> systems or are we supposed to run STABLE?  Seems to me it's
>> counter-intuitive to call something STABLE and not have it meant for
>> production.  My head hurts.
>>
>> matt
> 
> 
> I couldnt agree more with this comment. My head hurt after
> trying to figure this out as well..
> 
> Yea. The information seems to contradict itself.
> The only thing I have been able to 100% figure out is:
> 
> #*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6_0
> -> release branch/security fixes only
> Results in: 6.0-RELEASE
> 
> #*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_6
> -> 6.0 + changes will eventually be 6.1
> Results in: 6.0-STABLE
> 
> It is perhaps a bit easier in OpenBSD land. -STABLE means only bugfixes
> and important patches. In FreeBSD - this seems not the case?
> 
> -JD
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> 

And here once again, the website tells us:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html#STABLE

Good Lord, it's a wunnerful thing to read.

-- 
Best regards,
Chris

The first bug to hit a clean windshield lands directly
in front of your eyes.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4388CDFF.4090203>