From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 22 21:30:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125F016A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-27.ig.com.br (smtp-27.ig.com.br [200.226.132.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77AA043D1D for ; Thu, 22 Jan 2004 21:30:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hlen@ig.com.br) Received: (qmail 3966 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2004 05:30:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ig.com.br) (200.141.81.51) by smtp-27.ig.com.br with SMTP; 23 Jan 2004 05:30:26 -0000 Message-ID: <4010B14F.9050600@ig.com.br> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 03:29:51 -0200 From: Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20040121 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 05:30:28 -0000 Hello all, Maybe this is not the best list to post this question, but it won't hurt. I've been compiling everything from source for lack of options, and was just wondering what should be the policy for 5.1 package-feeding, since the upgrade process has been described as very unstable at the present time. Thanks in advance, -- Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto