From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Tue Jun 14 14:16:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D0AAF2B3D for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from diana.db.net (unknown [IPv6:2620:64:0:1:223:7dff:fea2:c8f2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78F9262F for ; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:16:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from night.db.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diana.db.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED012AA3A4; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:15:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: by night.db.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C27E31CDE4; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:16:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:16:20 -0400 From: Diane Bruce To: Tim Kientzle Cc: lausts@acm.org, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crossbuild Failure on Arm Message-ID: <20160614141620.GA35198@night.db.net> References: <20160613182234.GA72262@mail.laus.org> <9A77CE9C-C154-4449-9EF7-CA268D763B98@kientzle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9A77CE9C-C154-4449-9EF7-CA268D763B98@kientzle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:16:24 -0000 On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 07:01:17AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > > On Jun 13, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Thomas Laus wrote: > > > > I wanted to add a few NIC cards to my Beaglebone, so my next step was > > to build a toolchain for the arm arch. > ... > The only caveat: Local driver development will crash the machine occasionally, which will lose recent writes to the filesystem. Use git and push your work to some other machine regularly. NFS can also help here. What I have done is NFS src and /tmp /var/tmp Using flash as a R/W like that is slower than using NFS and you stand less chance of trashing a fs on the board. > > Cheers, > > Tim > Diane -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db