From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 25 14:19:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870CD7FD; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: from keltia.net (aran.keltia.net [88.191.250.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCA32FAC; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lonrach.local (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:ee87:4a00:fc3e:26b0:e8f8:2c6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: roberto) by keltia.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28B7E52AE; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 16:19:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 16:19:42 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch to improve AES-NI performance Message-ID: <20130825141942.GB19969@lonrach.local> References: <20130822202027.GH94127@funkthat.com> <20130823151615.GD41379@roberto02-aw.erc.corp.eurocontrol.int> <20130823180413.GL94127@funkthat.com> <20130823182752.GA15392@lonrach.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130823182752.GA15392@lonrach.local> X-Operating-System: MacOS X / MBP 4,1 - FreeBSD 8.0 / T3500-E5520 Nehalem User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 14:19:46 -0000 According to Ollivier Robert: > You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the "code" one. FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839 as r254856 in stable/9 as it is a prerequesite to apply jmg's patch. I've asked re@ whether they would consider this for 9.2. It is very late in the 9.2 release circle but that patch has been in 10 for more than a year now... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/