From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 10 11:42:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from newmail.sentex.ca (newmail.sentex.ca [207.245.238.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C92937B87C for ; Wed, 10 May 2000 11:42:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.ca) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite-atm.sentex.ca [209.112.4.1]) by newmail.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA72830; Wed, 10 May 2000 13:40:33 GMT (envelope-from mike@sentex.ca) Received: from simoeon (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA06523; Wed, 10 May 2000 14:42:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000510143910.02904cc0@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 14:39:10 -0400 To: Rudy Rucker From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: ** HEADS UP ** /dev/[u]random file changes. Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <20000510070201.A90690@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 03:42 AM 5/10/00 -0700, Rudy Rucker wrote: > >I got the same failures last night. Is it common to make commits to the >-stable branch without attempting a build? > >Don't get my tone wrong, I'm just curious about the FreeBSD >development process. I track it fairly often and no, its not common. More common are people getting caught in the middle of a large commit and they dont get all the bits. But even that is quite rare when you compare it to the amount of times the process works without issue. ---Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications mike@sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message