From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Apr  8 13:19: 6 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from lark.capnet.state.tx.us (lark.capnet.state.tx.us [204.65.39.249])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8F437B579
	for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  8 Apr 2000 13:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from Bryan.Bradsby@capnet.state.tx.us)
Received: from localhost (bbradsby@localhost)
	by lark.capnet.state.tx.us (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e38KIkB32027;
	Sat, 8 Apr 2000 15:18:46 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 15:18:46 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bryan Bradsby <Bryan.Bradsby@capnet.state.tx.us>
To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc: "Konstantin A. Potcheyking" <kas@orient.net.ru>,
	FreeBSD Questions <questions@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Trouble with Digital 21140A
In-Reply-To: <20000406162716.L73669@freebie.lemis.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004081508000.2082-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > You left off the netmask. Might not be needed, but try something like
> > this:
> > ifconfig de0 inet 18.3.1.20 media 10baseT/UTP netmask 255.255.255.240
> 
> Don't invent net masks.  They need to be the same for all systems on
> the net, 

Agreed. I did not mean to suggest the use of a bogus netmask. 

> and 255.255.255.240 is decidely unusual.  

Unusual, but works for me at home. 

> Greg

-bryan



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message