Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 17:06:02 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru> To: James <haesu@towardex.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack Message-ID: <20040305140602.GB49148@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040304172651.GA86659@scylla.towardex.com> References: <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org> <200403011507.52238.wes@softweyr.com> <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com> <20040302042957.GH3841@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302082625.GE22985@cell.sick.ru> <20040303181034.GA58284@scylla.towardex.com> <20040304131000.GA41474@cell.sick.ru> <20040304172529.GA86502@scylla.towardex.com> <20040304172651.GA86659@scylla.towardex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 12:26:51PM -0500, James wrote: J> > that was my thought initially, BUT.. actually... you can J> > actually do this no problem using mrtd dumps and pick it up with a J> > program via bgp device :P no need to create another api it seems :) J> J> errr??? I meant bpf device... Implementing traffic accounting like ip accounting or netflow through a bpf is generally a bad idea, because of poor performance of such a solution. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040305140602.GB49148>