From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 22 1: 8:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5609637B401 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 01:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cse.cs.huji.ac.il (cse.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D048343E6A for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 01:08:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny) by cse.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 183u5Y-0003Yc-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:08:32 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Terry Lambert Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: malloc In-Reply-To: Message from Terry Lambert of "Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:55:17 MST." <3DB4F655.776C99EE@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:08:32 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [...] > If you want GNU malloc behaviour, then you should install the port > for the GNU allocator, and use it instead of the system allocator, > and you will end up with the same behaviour that your application > has on Linux. what ticked my curiosity was that the linux binary did work, while the fbsd binary did the right thing with respect to the admin limits and coredumped when the datasize limit was exeeded. danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message