From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jul 2 19:02:35 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA26568 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jul 1996 19:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu (kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu [128.52.46.40]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA26552 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 1996 19:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12GNU) id WAA07812; Tue, 2 Jul 1996 22:02:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 22:02:21 -0400 Message-Id: <199607030202.WAA07812@kropotkin.gnu.ai.mit.edu> To: delerium@eagle.ais.net CC: walter@biostat.sph.unc.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (delerium@eagle.ais.net) Subject: Re: SIG's 11 and 6... From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk HUMAN REPLICAS are inserted into VATS of NUTRITIONAL YEAST... > I wonder if my problem is actually heat-related as well? Reducing > the CPU clock may simply cause the chip to run cooler. Anyone > else have similar troubles, or other ideas? It is the case that reducing the clock causes the chip to run cooler. In fact, the way that Intel (and others) decide on the speed of a given chip is by clocking one in the batch higher and higher until it fries, drop that speed by x%, and stamp it on. -- http://www.wp.com/piquan --- Joel Ray Holveck --- joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu Fourth law of computing: Anything that can go wro .signature: segmentation violation -- core dumped