From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 6 21:49:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA851065670 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:49:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354AD8FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 21:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so4806342wgb.31 for ; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:49:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gMI5RrBtsmgCCpkpYA0kAIWm1oDYMQt41WDAhRZD24A=; b=Kp4dkvqE+Tqb8W2v5xr4/EeI/yEzXghTBNfZ91Ua4MY/f/wkgW6d89JhPlVEmWbMl0 oDBN8+/mfNklbq02+dZjp8fXMW5zxqn2ApGe+Bw6zdMTvAf6U0bTURjSUIw/uDIkXBWc Kq6atWFQpFWMsFbCiBkwv74sSWvQVwrDJOaAoWiwG/c2oJW7ziBP+TR9fsiqScNX+YXw H1D8jL9GV54jUEEMxxhxu+vO55j+hSoy6bimf0Yqaeb3nAlTmRBrJy6tQPDbTuqbf3YA Qe0TZDF58kSAU7VI0r+IPRzrhvcZXFjPMVdNDnWykvZ4K5QnXf6sj0o6pKczgPL2zM5K do6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr21572814wiw.18.1331070596206; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:49:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.198.81 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:49:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201203062245.41155.zec@fer.hr> References: <201203062157.22390.zec@fer.hr> <201203062245.41155.zec@fer.hr> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:49:56 -0800 Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Marko Zec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:09:55 +0000 Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIMAGE + kldload wlan + kldload wtap panic X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:49:57 -0000 Wait a sec. Is it possible that the macro is a no-op when we're building modules w/ VNET? Adrian